Skip to main content
GW Regulatory Studies Podcast

GW Regulatory Studies Podcast

By GW Regulatory Studies Center

Listen for insights and commentary on regulatory policy from The George Washington University Regulatory Studies Center. We are a leading source for scholarship on best practices, benefit-cost analysis, regulatory risk assessment, competition analysis, and public interest comments in the rulemaking process. The Center's weekly Regulation Digest newsletter is a popular source for policy news and commentary.
Available on
Amazon Music Logo
Apple Podcasts Logo
Google Podcasts Logo
Spotify Logo
Currently playing episode

HUD's Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing proposal

GW Regulatory Studies PodcastApr 11, 2023

00:00
13:37
Roger Nober on Regulation by Adjudication
Apr 15, 202421:16
Technology and Public Commenting: Congress Takes Action
Apr 02, 202414:04
A Lookback at the Law: How Congress Uses the CRA
Mar 12, 202408:27
2023 Regulatory Year In Review
Jan 23, 202435:30
Bryce Chinault on EV Mandates in Connecticut
Jan 17, 202433:33
Biden's Fall 2023 Unified Agenda
Dec 19, 202315:58
New Goals, Old Tools for Broadening Public Participation in the Regulatory Process in the Biden Administration
Dec 05, 202320:08
Comparing the Draft and Final Circular A-4
Nov 29, 202331:06
Understanding the Call for an AM Radio Mandate
Oct 24, 202314:24
Discussing the Draft Merger Guidelines with Mary Sullivan and Joe Cordes
Sep 26, 202322:31
Reeve Bull on Building an Evidence-Based System of Regulatory Analysis from the Bottom-Up
Sep 12, 202324:35
Discounting to Achieve Policy Preferences
Aug 16, 202312:08
How to Engage the Public: OIRA's New Guidance to Agencies
Aug 02, 202315:45
Biden's Spring 2023 Unified Agenda
Jun 28, 202314:39
Safeguarding Objective and Evidence-Based Principles for Regulatory Impact Analysis

Safeguarding Objective and Evidence-Based Principles for Regulatory Impact Analysis

GW Regulatory Studies Center Director Susan Dudley shares her perspectives on the OMB Draft Circular A4. Susan emphasizes the durability of regulatory impact analysis under the existing circular across administrations dating back nearly 30 years. Although the draft revisions contain some worthwhile updates, Susan explains that some aspects of the draft appear designed to steer analytical results to support this administration’s policy preferences, rather than present objective evidence and estimates to policy makers and the public. Safeguarding the objectivity and durability of regulatory analysis is key for the circular's value going forward.

Jun 20, 202320:40
Challenges with Distributional Weighting in the Draft Circular A-4

Challenges with Distributional Weighting in the Draft Circular A-4

Economist and scholar Mary Sullivan joins the podcast to share perspectives on the proposed introduction of distributional weighting as part of the new draft Circular A-4. The circular, which guides analysis of regulatory costs and benefits, aims to address issues of equity when those costs and benefits are borne differently among various groups. Trade-offs in economic efficiency and lesser transparency are important factors to consider, Mary explains.

Jun 12, 202324:01
What’s In the EO on Modernizing Regulatory Review?
Apr 26, 202322:55
HUD's Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing proposal
Apr 11, 202313:37
Jimmy Carter, The Great Deregulator
Mar 21, 202312:13
Top Ten Trends in Federal Agency Actions
Mar 08, 202330:18
Broadening Public Engagement in the Federal Regulatory Process
Mar 06, 202325:01
Transparency, Participation, and Responsiveness in Hong Kong Consultative Policymaking

Transparency, Participation, and Responsiveness in Hong Kong Consultative Policymaking

Although consultation promises to bolster the legitimacy of government decisions, it is possible that—in practice—instruments such as the notice and comment process fail to promote transparency, participation, and responsiveness in policymaking. In this discussion, we hear from RSC Co-director Steven Balla and PhD candidates Bosco Yeung and Huang Chen—authors of a new paper on the consultative policy process used in Hong Kong. Listen for highlights about Hong Kong's effectiveness in consultation and recommendations to improve public participation. Access the complete paper at https://regulatorystudies.columbian.gwu.edu/transparency-participation-and-responsiveness-hong-kong-consultative-policymaking. 

Feb 21, 202323:37
Will ChatGPT Break Notice and Comment for Regulations?

Will ChatGPT Break Notice and Comment for Regulations?

ChatGPT is an AI chat bot capable of remarkably human responses. Is the regulatory commenting process prepared for this game-changing technology? GW Law Vice Provost Emily Hammond joins GW Regulatory Studies experts Bridget Dooling, Steve Balla and Mark Febrizio to discuss the implications ChatGPT creates for the public commenting process used at regulatory agencies.
Jan 13, 202344:27
Nobel Prize and FCC Spectrum Auctions

Nobel Prize and FCC Spectrum Auctions

Jerry Ellig hosts this podcast to interview Evan Kwerel who is a senior economic advisor at the Federal Communications Commission, and has played a central role in the development and execution of spectrum auctions. Jerry and Evan reflect on this policy development in light of the recent Nobel Prize awarded to Paul Milgrom and Robert Wilson who's contributions made it all possible.
Oct 28, 202059:05
The DEA, COVID-19, and the Opioid Crisis
Oct 02, 202018:29
FY 2021 Regulators' Budget
Sep 24, 202016:01
Trump's Executive Order on Social Media Regulation

Trump's Executive Order on Social Media Regulation

Former FCC chief economist and current GW Regulatory Studies Center research professor Jerry Ellig discusses his recent Commentary on President Trump's recent executive order on preventing online censorship.

Hosted by Bryce Chinault.
Jun 11, 202013:38